|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 11, 2016 9:31:36 GMT -8
He's just got to get under better control and he'll be good. I'm hoping Luke's offense and guidance will help him. You think (no you hope!) that Randle, who can't shoot, and Luke's offense which most likely will be predicated on 3 point shooting, will help??? Passing actually |
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 11, 2016 9:34:11 GMT -8
He's just got to get under better control and he'll be good. I'm hoping Luke's offense and guidance will help him. You think (no you hope!) that Randle, who can't shoot, and Luke's offense which most likely will be predicated on 3 point shooting, will help??? You may be kidding yourself Webber never shot 42% for a season lets hope it was just rust for being out a year. He shot 41% in 2003 And 43% in 2004 Looks like someone is hellbent on being a moron who talks out of his ass. |
|
kobe24
::| Loyal Member |::
Posts: 220 
|
Post by kobe24 on Jul 11, 2016 10:37:30 GMT -8
You think (no you hope!) that Randle, who can't shoot, and Luke's offense which most likely will be predicated on 3 point shooting, will help??? Webber never shot 42% for a season lets hope it was just rust for being out a year. He shot 41% in 2003 And 43% in 2004 Looks like someone is hellbent on being a moron who talks out of his ass. I stand corrected webber shot poorly post injury on the tale end of his career , but through his first 5 - years webber was highly effective and webber at this point is who Randle resembles the most but I will be watching Julius efficiency very closely this season in effort to give him benefit of the doubt that it was just post injury rust. He needs to be a double double player @50% |
|
|
|
Post by shaolinfighter on Jul 11, 2016 11:12:27 GMT -8
I don't see Randle as a Webber type tbh. Different kinds of players
Let's see what does this season
|
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 11, 2016 11:17:12 GMT -8
I don't see Randle as a Webber type tbh. Different kinds of players Let's see what does this season Yeah definitely not his best comparison. Webber was soft, shied away from contact but was a solid ball handler / passer for a 6'10" PF. Julius is more of a bull, he gets in there and bangs, scraps around the rim... A quality every team needs IMO. |
|
kobe24
::| Loyal Member |::
Posts: 220
|
Post by kobe24 on Jul 11, 2016 14:41:42 GMT -8
Webber was soft. Wtf??? The comparisons are to a T. Same moves same style same everything. Webber soft? Wtf?  |
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 11, 2016 14:54:10 GMT -8
Webber was soft. Wtf??? The comparisons are to a T. Same moves same style same everything. Webber soft? Wtf? Yeah. Clearly you didn't watch him. |
|
|
|
Post by shaolinfighter on Jul 11, 2016 16:08:34 GMT -8
Webber was soft. Wtf??? The comparisons are to a T. Same moves same style same everything. Webber soft? Wtf? You trolling... Lol. Same moves same everything? Explain further |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2016 13:06:46 GMT -8
Webber was soft. Wtf??? The comparisons are to a T. Same moves same style same everything. Webber soft? Wtf? Yeah. Clearly you didn't watch him. Webber was so soft he made Vlade look hard. |
|
kobe24
::| Loyal Member |::
Posts: 220
|
Post by kobe24 on Jul 26, 2018 20:27:06 GMT -8
Lol @ thinking Chris Webber was soft
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 20:34:37 GMT -8
Lol @ thinking Chris Webber was soft Wow it took you two years to get back to this. And Yes Webber was soft. Both physically and between the ears. Which is why the Kings trophy case looks like this.  |
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 26, 2018 20:41:56 GMT -8
This fool comes back just to say Chris Webber wasn’t soft?
|
|
kobe24
::| Loyal Member |::
Posts: 220
|
Post by kobe24 on Jul 26, 2018 20:49:12 GMT -8
Lol @ thinking Chris Webber was soft Wow it took you two years to get back to this. And Yes Webber was soft. Both physically and between the ears. Which is why the Kings trophy case looks like this. Ok guy. They were better than any team in the league except prime Shaq and Kobe ... but let's not forget all that and even if they had managed to squeak by the most dominant player ever in the prime of his career it's arguably undebatable that they would have demolished any team that would have came out the east the kings were that good in fact they may have been better than the Lakers but they just couldn't beat the Lakers because they had two of the best players in the world |
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 26, 2018 20:49:35 GMT -8
Not so sure about the interior d with that lineup I think Nance Jrs help defense is fine. If you put a guy like Mosgov in there and say "now our interior defense is better" now you have a player out there will get switched to death on the perimeter and your defense folds in that way. Look at this gem from 2 years back |
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 26, 2018 20:50:01 GMT -8
Wow it took you two years to get back to this. And Yes Webber was soft. Both physically and between the ears. Which is why the Kings trophy case looks like this. Ok guy. They were better than any team in the league except prime Shaq and Kobe ... but let's not forget all that and even if they had managed to squeak by the most dominant player ever in the prime of his career it's arguably undebatable that they would have demolished any team that would have came out the east the kings were that good in fact they may have been better than the Lakers but they just couldn't beat the Lakers because they had two of the best players in the world What does better have to do with not being soft? |
|
kobe24
::| Loyal Member |::
Posts: 220
|
Post by kobe24 on Jul 26, 2018 20:50:56 GMT -8
This fool comes back just to say Chris Webber wasn’t soft? Not a fool I just don't forget how dominant Chris Webber was as a player |
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 26, 2018 21:01:44 GMT -8
This fool comes back just to say Chris Webber wasn’t soft? Not a fool I just don't forget how dominant Chris Webber was as a player Still doesn’t address his softness as a player. It was trait, just like his passing and post skills. To deny it is fanboy idiocy. |
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Jul 26, 2018 21:09:51 GMT -8
Trust me boy, you better know your shit before you bring that weak shit in here. Talking about the Queens like they ever won shit. They had exactly 1 good year and that was 2002. Acting like they were some dominant team who'd have beat everyone if not for Shaq and Kobe? What about in 2000 when they were 1st round fodder? In 2001 Kobe annihilated them via sweep in a completely non competitive series. 2003 they were beat by Dallas in the 2nd round...
WTF are you talking about besides myth making?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 21:14:41 GMT -8
Wow it took you two years to get back to this. And Yes Webber was soft. Both physically and between the ears. Which is why the Kings trophy case looks like this. Ok guy. They were better than any team in the league except prime Shaq and Kobe ... but let's not forget all that and even if they had managed to squeak by the most dominant player ever in the prime of his career it's arguably undebatable that they would have demolished any team that would have came out the east the kings were that good in fact they may have been better than the Lakers but they just couldn't beat the Lakers because they had two of the best players in the world Reality is they didn't have what it took to be great. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 21:16:41 GMT -8
Trust me boy, you better know your shit before you bring that weak shit in here. Talking about the Queens like they ever won shit. They had exactly 1 good year and that was 2002. Acting like they were some dominant team who'd have beat everyone if not for Shaq and Kobe? What about in 2000 when they were 1st round fodder? In 2001 Kobe annihilated them via sweep in a completely non competitive series. 2003 they were beat by Dallas in the 2nd round... WTF are you talking about besides myth making? Been quite some time since I've seen a Kings troll. Didn't think they still existed. |
|
|:: Los Angeles Lakers Forum
