|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 0:07:06 GMT -8
Who’s justifying his actions? I stated that Democrats have been trying to impeach him since he was elected. Is that not true? Yes and for good reason. You sound like somebody that completely ignores how Trump has handled the job. Your issue seems to be more about Democrats than the man who has warranted the criticism by his behavior in office. He speaks in the defensive voice, proof that whatever source of information he has, it is also speaking in the defensive voice. Parrot brains parrot these things.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 12:13:24 GMT -8
Who’s justifying his actions? I stated that Democrats have been trying to impeach him since he was elected. Is that not true? Yes and for good reason. You sound like somebody that completely ignores how Trump has handled the job. Your issue seems to be more about Democrats than the man who has warranted the criticism by his behavior in office. My issue is with both parties which is why I’m an Independent. I look at both sides and see typical partisan politics. You’re partisan so you can’t see it. The Democrats have wanted to impeach him before he took the oath of office. Is that true or not?
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 12:21:00 GMT -8
Yes and for good reason. You sound like somebody that completely ignores how Trump has handled the job. Your issue seems to be more about Democrats than the man who has warranted the criticism by his behavior in office. He speaks in the defensive voice, proof that whatever source of information he has, it is also speaking in the defensive voice. Parrot brains parrot these things. You’re just a typical idiotic partisan shill. The Democrats have wanted impeachment since before he took his oath of office. I don’t like Trump either but you partisan shills don’t have a clue. The impeachment dies in the Senate with a majority of Republicans and if you can’t see that then you’re dummer than a box of rocks. Your only hope is if Evangelicals and Hardline Conservatives pull a coup!
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 12:35:45 GMT -8
He speaks in the defensive voice, proof that whatever source of information he has, it is also speaking in the defensive voice. Parrot brains parrot these things. You’re just a typical idiotic partisan shill. The Democrats have wanted impeachment since before he took his oath of office. I don’t like Trump either but you partisan shills don’t have a clue. The impeachment dies in the Senate with a majority of Republicans and if you can’t see that then you’re dummer than a box of rocks. Your only hope is if Evangelicals and Hardline Conservatives pull a coup! Lol fucking moron. I don’t identify as a Democrat, nor do I follow party propaganda. You ARE perpetuating Republican talking points like the parrot brained fool that you are. I asked you, do laws apply or don’t they? Answer that. Don’t run away from it like a Cuckservative coward. Either the laws apply or they don’t. Never once did I say what would happen with the Impeachment process and how the Senate will handle it. You immediately interjected what you think I don’t know, AGAIN repeating a Republican propaganda talking point like a parrot. I don’t think the Senate will follow the rule of law, and they are enabled to do so because of morons like yourself who don’t think it matters. If partisan poltics dictates that parties simply stick together regardless of their behavior, placing themselves above the rule of law, then none of us have a functioning republic. The fact that you called me a partisan shill proves you don’t know shit, do you realize that there are thousands of other parrot brained retards who immediately say EXACTLY the same thing about anyone who points out facts and laws? You have ZERO original insight on the matter to call your own but yet you feel empowered to open your mouth and speak about things while attacking those who disagree. You’re human trash.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 12:44:47 GMT -8
You’re just a typical idiotic partisan shill. The Democrats have wanted impeachment since before he took his oath of office. I don’t like Trump either but you partisan shills don’t have a clue. The impeachment dies in the Senate with a majority of Republicans and if you can’t see that then you’re dummer than a box of rocks. Your only hope is if Evangelicals and Hardline Conservatives pull a coup! Lol fucking moron. I don’t identify as a Democrat, nor do I follow party propaganda. You ARE perpetuating Republican talking points like the parrot brained fool that you are. I asked you, do laws apply or don’t they? Answer that. Don’t run away from it like a Cuckservative coward. Either the laws apply or they don’t. Never once did I say what would happen with the Impeachment process and how the Senate will handle it. You immediately interjected what you think I don’t know, AGAIN repeating a Republican propaganda talking point like a parrot. I don’t think the Senate will follow the rule of law, and they are enabled to do so because of morons like yourself who don’t think it matters. If partisan poltics dictates that parties simply stick together regardless of their behavior, then none of us have a functioning republic. The fact that you called me a partisan shill proves you don’t know shit, do you realize that there are thousands of other parrot brained retards who immediately say EXACTLY the same thing about anyone who points out facts and laws? You have ZERO original insight on the matter to call your own but yet you feel empowered to open your mouth and speak about things while attacking those who disagree. You’re human trash. You sound like a typical Libtard asshole talking about Laws! What LAW was broken? You Democrats and Republicans deserve each other gang banging over politics. You asshole are human feces.
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 12:52:00 GMT -8
Lol fucking moron. I don’t identify as a Democrat, nor do I follow party propaganda. You ARE perpetuating Republican talking points like the parrot brained fool that you are. I asked you, do laws apply or don’t they? Answer that. Don’t run away from it like a Cuckservative coward. Either the laws apply or they don’t. Never once did I say what would happen with the Impeachment process and how the Senate will handle it. You immediately interjected what you think I don’t know, AGAIN repeating a Republican propaganda talking point like a parrot. I don’t think the Senate will follow the rule of law, and they are enabled to do so because of morons like yourself who don’t think it matters. If partisan poltics dictates that parties simply stick together regardless of their behavior, then none of us have a functioning republic. The fact that you called me a partisan shill proves you don’t know shit, do you realize that there are thousands of other parrot brained retards who immediately say EXACTLY the same thing about anyone who points out facts and laws? You have ZERO original insight on the matter to call your own but yet you feel empowered to open your mouth and speak about things while attacking those who disagree. You’re human trash. You sound like a typical Libtard asshole talking about Laws! What LAW was broken? You Democrats and Republicans deserve each other gang banging over politics. You asshole are human feces. If I sound like a typical anything to you, it proves you aren’t at all educated about the topics you speak freely about. The Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. Do you know it? Those laws are actively being broken on a D-A-I-L-Y basis since the day he took office. I know you won’t address this FACT and will instead deflect like the pea brained moron that you are. But know that I answered your question and I answered it factually. If you can’t construct a counter argument based on facts that you can put into your own words without mama bird propaganda Fox News telling you what to say, then you’re an imbecile, someone who should stay out of conversations that are too complex for you. If you want to have a debate with me, focus on what I say, don’t reach into your bag of Republican talking points that you blanket addres to all “libtards.” That’s how you prove you are nothing more than a parrot brained moron.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 13:15:32 GMT -8
You sound like a typical Libtard asshole talking about Laws! What LAW was broken? You Democrats and Republicans deserve each other gang banging over politics. You asshole are human feces. If I sound like a typical anything to you, it proves you aren’t at all educated about the topics you speak freely about. The Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. Do you know it? Those laws are actively being broken on a D-A-I-L-Y basis since the day he took office. I know you won’t address this FACT and will instead deflect like the pea brained moron that you are. But know that I answered your question and I answered it factually. If you can’t construct a counter argument based on facts that you can put into your own words without mama bird propaganda Fox News telling you what to say, then you’re an imbecile, someone who should stay out of conversations that are too complex for you. If you want to have a debate with me, focus on what I say, don’t reach into your bag of Republican talking points that you blanket addres to all “libtards.” That’s how you prove you are nothing more than a parrot brained moron. The Emoluments Clause is not a LAW dumbass! It’s a provision in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8. Trump is being impeached for abuse of power and obstruction based on a phone call that was overheard by someone! You Democrats with your anger that a former Democrat Donor, who was loved by Democrats beat your Bitch, who got donations from Trump. If the Emoluments Clause was grounds for impeachment then Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush Sr, Reagan, Carter and Ford could have been impeached. With the partisan impeachment every President, Republican or Democrat will face impeachment. All because Democrats lost in 2016.
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 13:15:35 GMT -8
Also FYI the Independent Party is a partisan platform, it does not mean it is “independent” in its positions in any way.
But humor me, explain to me the Independent Party doctrine that inspired you to join their party and why.
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 13:19:19 GMT -8
If I sound like a typical anything to you, it proves you aren’t at all educated about the topics you speak freely about. The Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. Do you know it? Those laws are actively being broken on a D-A-I-L-Y basis since the day he took office. I know you won’t address this FACT and will instead deflect like the pea brained moron that you are. But know that I answered your question and I answered it factually. If you can’t construct a counter argument based on facts that you can put into your own words without mama bird propaganda Fox News telling you what to say, then you’re an imbecile, someone who should stay out of conversations that are too complex for you. If you want to have a debate with me, focus on what I say, don’t reach into your bag of Republican talking points that you blanket addres to all “libtards.” That’s how you prove you are nothing more than a parrot brained moron. The Emoluments Clause is not a LAW dumbass! It’s a provision in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8. Trump is being impeached for abuse of power and obstruction based on a phone call that was overheard by someone! You Democrats with your anger that a former Democrat Donor, who was loved by Democrats beat your Bitch, who got donations from Trump. If the Emoluments Clause was grounds for impeachment then Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush Sr, Reagan, Carter and Ford could have been impeached. With the partisan impeachment every President, Republican or Democrat will face impeachment. All because Democrats lost in 2016. A clause in the Constitution is not a law? You’re really this fucking stupid? That’s what laws are you fucking imbecile. Try again. See morons like you think that simply have a comeback is good enough. It doesn’t have to be rooted in fact or truth, just say whatever you want and make up nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 13:33:57 GMT -8
Another educational piece for your parrot brain today:
The Republican talking point of instructing it’s parrot followers to repeatedly ask “What law did Trump break” is a red herring argument.
Congress has the authority to define the terms of Impeachment as bestowed to them by the Constitution. The 3 former Presidents who were impeached or had Impeachment inquiry brought against them did not necessarily break any laws as breaking laws is not the precedent for Impeachment historically speaking.
Also, repeatedly crying that Democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since Day 1 is false. You have to have control of the House of Representatives to do that which they didn’t until January 2019. So again, you are speaking out of your ass like an uninformed retard.
But even if they had control since day 1 the same charge can be accurately levied against Republicans who ran this campaign against Clinton after he was re-elected in 1996 and he violated none of the “laws” that Trump has. Bribery is an Impeachable offense, manipulation of markets is an impeachable offense. Attacking private citizens with whom you have personal vendettas against is an impeachable offense. I could go on but I don’t think I need to. You don’t know what you’re talking about and you should seriously shut the fuck and read a book or ten.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 13:41:53 GMT -8
The Emoluments Clause is not a LAW dumbass! It’s a provision in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8. Trump is being impeached for abuse of power and obstruction based on a phone call that was overheard by someone! You Democrats with your anger that a former Democrat Donor, who was loved by Democrats beat your Bitch, who got donations from Trump. If the Emoluments Clause was grounds for impeachment then Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush Sr, Reagan, Carter and Ford could have been impeached. With the partisan impeachment every President, Republican or Democrat will face impeachment. All because Democrats lost in 2016. A clause in the Constitution is not a law? You’re really this fucking stupid? That’s what laws are you fucking imbecile. Try again. See morons like you think that simply have a comeback is good enough. It doesn’t have to be rooted in fact or truth, just say whatever you want and make up nonsense. Article 1 - The Legislative Branch - Section 9 is the Law. The Emoluments is one of the eight provisions. Trump didn’t receive a payment which throws Emoluments out the window. Now Bidens son received payments while Biden was VP. That’s a Emoluments Clause violation!
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 13:55:13 GMT -8
A clause in the Constitution is not a law? You’re really this fucking stupid? That’s what laws are you fucking imbecile. Try again. See morons like you think that simply have a comeback is good enough. It doesn’t have to be rooted in fact or truth, just say whatever you want and make up nonsense. Article 1 - The Legislative Branch - Section 9 is the Law. The Emoluments is one of the eight provisions. Trump didn’t receive a payment which throws Emoluments out the window. Now Bidens son received payments while Biden was VP. That’s a Emoluments Clause violation! Republican talking point #5 in this discussion. Good little parrot. Trump didn’t receive payments according to whom? List your source of that information. Was it Fox News who told you that? Without an accurate and reputable source you are repeating more propaganda Little parrot boy. Yes, the Emoluments Clause is one of several provisions to a specific law. Those provisions provide the basis for which THE LAW is to be applied. There’s no need to reply any further about it, you’re a fucking idiot of epic proportions to suggest it’s not a law while copying and pasting Wikipedia passages and simultaneously saying that provisions to laws aren’t laws. An Indpendent Party member who doesn’t know his party doctrine and spews All Republican talking points over and over again. Aka the dumbest fucktards on earth.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 14:06:46 GMT -8
Article 1 - The Legislative Branch - Section 9 is the Law. The Emoluments is one of the eight provisions. Trump didn’t receive a payment which throws Emoluments out the window. Now Bidens son received payments while Biden was VP. That’s a Emoluments Clause violation! Republican talking point #5 in this discussion. Good little parrot. Trump didn’t receive payments according to whom? List your source of that information. Was it Fox News who told you that? Without an accurate and reputable source you are repeating more propaganda Little parrot boy. Yes, the Emoluments Clause is one of several provisions to a specific law. Those provisions provide the basis for which THE LAW is to be applied. There’s no need to reply any further about it, you’re a fucking idiot of epic proportions to suggest it’s not a law while copying and pasting Wikipedia passages and simultaneously saying that provisions to laws aren’t laws. An Indpendent Party member who doesn’t know his party doctrine and spews All Republican talking points over and over again. Aka the dumbest fucktards on earth. I don’t watch cable news. I get my news from Reuters. Typical asshole assumption. Where is the proof that Trump received payments? To violate the Emoluments provision Trump has to receive a payment. If you were truly non partisan you would question Bidens son receiving millions of dollars from the Ukraine. At least I can admit that both Trump and Biden just like every other President and politician are corrupt. You can’t do that can you asshole!?
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 14:21:34 GMT -8
Republican talking point #5 in this discussion. Good little parrot. Trump didn’t receive payments according to whom? List your source of that information. Was it Fox News who told you that? Without an accurate and reputable source you are repeating more propaganda Little parrot boy. Yes, the Emoluments Clause is one of several provisions to a specific law. Those provisions provide the basis for which THE LAW is to be applied. There’s no need to reply any further about it, you’re a fucking idiot of epic proportions to suggest it’s not a law while copying and pasting Wikipedia passages and simultaneously saying that provisions to laws aren’t laws. An Indpendent Party member who doesn’t know his party doctrine and spews All Republican talking points over and over again. Aka the dumbest fucktards on earth. I don’t watch cable news. I get my news from Reuters. Typical asshole assumption. Where is the proof that Trump received payments? To violate the Emoluments provision Trump has to receive a payment. If you were truly non partisan you would question Bidens son receiving millions of dollars from the Ukraine. At least I can admit that both Trump and Biden just like every other President and politician are corrupt. You can’t do that can you asshole!? Lol Reuters. Post the link that Reuters published that proves Trump has never profited or received payment in any form. I know as a fact that Fox News and other Republican propaganda outlets have SAID this on commentary platforms. I’ve never seen an investigative report that exonerated Trump on it. But you have so post it and prove it. If you don’t you’re a liar and a moron. Hunter Biden is a separate topic altogether. I can have that discussion but won’t with morons who use that story to deflect from what’s happening right now. But you should know that I’m someone who read James Risen’s Biden story on Ukraine in 2015. That was 4 years ago and it was never brought up by Republicans until now. Why? Because it became a Republican strategic talking point for their parrot brained retards to start suddenly squawking about. That’s you.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 14:33:52 GMT -8
I don’t watch cable news. I get my news from Reuters. Typical asshole assumption. Where is the proof that Trump received payments? To violate the Emoluments provision Trump has to receive a payment. If you were truly non partisan you would question Bidens son receiving millions of dollars from the Ukraine. At least I can admit that both Trump and Biden just like every other President and politician are corrupt. You can’t do that can you asshole!? Lol Reuters. Post the link that Reuters published that proves Trump has never profited or received payment in any form. I know as a fact that Fox News and other Republican propaganda outlets have SAID this on commentary platforms. I’ve never seen an investigative report that exonerated Trump on it. But you have so post it and prove it. If you don’t you’re a liar and a moron. Hunter Biden is a separate topic altogether. I can have that discussion but won’t with morons who use that story to deflect from what’s happening right now. But you should know that I’m someone who read James Risen’s Biden story on Ukraine in 2015. That was 4 years ago and it was never brought up by Republicans until now. Why? Because it became a Republican strategic talking point for their parrot brained retards to start suddenly squawking about. That’s you. You’re the one that said Trump violated the Emoluments provision which means you think Trump received a payment. I haven’t heard anyone else say that. So where did you get your proof that he accepted a payment? Where did you hear that from fool?
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 14:36:52 GMT -8
Lol Reuters. Post the link that Reuters published that proves Trump has never profited or received payment in any form. I know as a fact that Fox News and other Republican propaganda outlets have SAID this on commentary platforms. I’ve never seen an investigative report that exonerated Trump on it. But you have so post it and prove it. If you don’t you’re a liar and a moron. Hunter Biden is a separate topic altogether. I can have that discussion but won’t with morons who use that story to deflect from what’s happening right now. But you should know that I’m someone who read James Risen’s Biden story on Ukraine in 2015. That was 4 years ago and it was never brought up by Republicans until now. Why? Because it became a Republican strategic talking point for their parrot brained retards to start suddenly squawking about. That’s you. You’re the one that said Trump violated the Emoluments provision which means you think Trump received a payment. I haven’t heard anyone else say that. So where did you get your proof that he accepted a payment? Where did you hear that from fool? Post your story from Reuters that you claimed said he didn’t. Publicly elected official running his businesses on your dime and you’re too stupid to even want to hold him accountable. Because you’re an “Independent Party” member You define the term Dumbfuck.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 14:43:30 GMT -8
You’re the one that said Trump violated the Emoluments provision which means you think Trump received a payment. I haven’t heard anyone else say that. So where did you get your proof that he accepted a payment? Where did you hear that from fool? Post your story from Reuters that you claimed said he didn’t. Publicly elected official running his businesses on your dime and you’re too stupid to even want to hold him accountable. Because you’re an “Independent Party” member You define the term Dumbfuck. Ha ha ha. I never stated Reuters published a post you dumb ass! Ha ha ha I stated that’s where I get my news from instead of Cable News. Now, how did Trump violate the Emoluments provision fool?
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 15:07:13 GMT -8
Post your story from Reuters that you claimed said he didn’t. Publicly elected official running his businesses on your dime and you’re too stupid to even want to hold him accountable. Because you’re an “Independent Party” member You define the term Dumbfuck. Ha ha ha. I never stated Reuters published a post you dumb ass! Ha ha ha I stated that’s where I get my news from instead of Cable News. Now, how did Trump violate the Emoluments provision fool? Here’s a recap of that discussion: Me: Trump didn’t receive payments according to whom? List your source of that information. Was it Fox News who told you that? You: I don’t watch cable news. I get my news from Reuters. Typical asshole assumption. Me: Post the link that Reuters published that proves Trump has never profited or received payment in any form. You: I never stated Reuters published a post you dumb ass! Ha ha ha So you don’t know factually speaking anything about it. Reuters is a private media corporation that posts chimp brained headline garbage news. It doesn’t do investigative journalism that would look into government corruption. Somehow in that pea brain of yours you’ve chosen it out of an idiotic belief that it is somehow neutral and thorough in its reporting. It’s not. So if you don’t know and don’t bother to find out but yet repeatedly squawk Republican talking points over and over what the fuck is your point in speaking? It’s because you’re the cancer of society. The uneducated, uninformed ignorant population demographic that thinks little, takes no time to seek out truth and mirrors propaganda while telling everyone else you know what’s real and no one does. Go walk in front of bus.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 20, 2019 15:16:04 GMT -8
Ha ha ha. I never stated Reuters published a post you dumb ass! Ha ha ha I stated that’s where I get my news from instead of Cable News. Now, how did Trump violate the Emoluments provision fool? Here’s a recap of that discussion: Me: Trump didn’t receive payments according to whom? List your source of that information. Was it Fox News who told you that? You: I don’t watch cable news. I get my news from Reuters. Typical asshole assumption. Me: Post the link that Reuters published that proves Trump has never profited or received payment in any form. You: I never stated Reuters published a post you dumb ass! Ha ha ha So you don’t know factually speaking anything about it. Reuters is a private media corporation that posts chimp brained headline garbage news. It doesn’t do investigative journalism that would look into government corruption. Somehow in that pea brain of yours you’ve chosen it out of an idiotic belief that it is somehow neutral and thorough in its reporting. It’s not. So if you don’t know and don’t bother to find out but yet repeatedly squawk Republican talking points over and over what the fuck is your point in speaking? It’s because you’re the cancer of society. The uneducated, uninformed ignorant population demographic that thinks little, takes no time to seek out truth and mirrors propaganda while telling everyone else you know what’s real and no one does. Go walk in front of bus. Emoluments Mutha Fucka Emoluments! Who told you Trump violated it. Who told you he received a payment? If you can’t answer just put the gauge in your mouth and squeeze!
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 20, 2019 15:37:51 GMT -8
Post your story from Reuters that you claimed said he didn’t. Publicly elected official running his businesses on your dime and you’re too stupid to even want to hold him accountable. Because you’re an “Independent Party” member You define the term Dumbfuck. Ha ha ha. I never stated Reuters published a post you dumb ass! Ha ha ha I stated that’s where I get my news from instead of Cable News. Now, how did Trump violate the Emoluments provision fool? Me the fool? You don’t read, you don’t know history, you get headline news from Reuters which I know is lie because Reuters doesn’t push Republican chimp talking points that you constantly do. And you’re a coward who won’t own up to being a Republican enabler because you’re embarrassed of how stupid it makes you look to do so, Independent lol. Here is a link to an independent watchdog organization who’s investigated information on Trumps violations of this CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. www.citizensforethics.org/trump-conflicts-of-interest-tracking/Since the Trump properties refuses to disclose every foreign agent who stays at his properties, which by definition means who receives payment from as he is the owner of the those properties, it can’t be fully determined the extent of his violations without a transparent investigation, one he continues to block. That means the public servant who’s paid to govern in every Americans interest is using his power to privately profit and he does so on your dime. Too stupid to understand the game isn’t a legitimate excuse.
|
|