|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 13:52:23 GMT -8
Yeah, you're mad that Trump is President. He'll be YOUR President until 2024. In the meantime enjoy this great economy! I bet you wish Hillary Clinton was President! Nope I’m not. You think in that chimp brain that I am because you’re a low IQ moron, a cuck now going full Republican propaganda Retard. This is Breitbart Cuck retard material, something you’ve been denying all along pretending you’re an “Independent.” Yeah an independent Trump cock sucking moron. A coward too pussy to admit it and hides behind fake walls of neutrality. Do you wish Hillary was President?
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 22, 2019 14:37:10 GMT -8
Nope I’m not. You think in that chimp brain that I am because you’re a low IQ moron, a cuck now going full Republican propaganda Retard. This is Breitbart Cuck retard material, something you’ve been denying all along pretending you’re an “Independent.” Yeah an independent Trump cock sucking moron. A coward too pussy to admit it and hides behind fake walls of neutrality. Do you wish Hillary was President? Nope. In your own words no copy pasting like a chimp, describe what authority Congress has to invoke impeachment of a President.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 14:53:03 GMT -8
Do you wish Hillary was President? Nope. In your own words no copy pasting like a chimp, describe what authority Congress has to invoke impeachment of a President. The House has the authority to impeach and the Senate holds the trial. Who did you vote for in 2016?
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 22, 2019 15:01:03 GMT -8
Nope. In your own words no copy pasting like a chimp, describe what authority Congress has to invoke impeachment of a President. The House has the authority to impeach and the Senate holds the trial. Who did you vote for in 2016? You didn’t describe the power that the House has. This is important and it’s clear you don’t understand that power. Saying they have the authority is not thorough. Based on what? What grounds? Give it a try. Use google, Wikipedia, even get your kids to help you spell and sound out the words. But use only your own words. Try again.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 15:10:28 GMT -8
The House has the authority to impeach and the Senate holds the trial. Who did you vote for in 2016? You didn’t describe the power that the House has. This is important and it’s clear you don’t understand that power. Saying they have the authority is not thorough. Based on what? What grounds? Give it a try. Use google, Wikipedia, even get your kids to help you spell and sound out the words. But use only your own words. Try again. Who did you vote for in 2016?
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 22, 2019 15:17:57 GMT -8
You didn’t describe the power that the House has. This is important and it’s clear you don’t understand that power. Saying they have the authority is not thorough. Based on what? What grounds? Give it a try. Use google, Wikipedia, even get your kids to help you spell and sound out the words. But use only your own words. Try again. Who did you vote for in 2016? Nope. Answering a question with a question isn’t correct. Prove you know the Constitution or shut the fuck up. Try again
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 15:20:50 GMT -8
Who did you vote for in 2016? Nope. Answering a question with a question isn’t correct. Prove you know the Constitution or shut the fuck up. Try again I answered your question and asked you one in return. You didn't answer. Who did you vote for in 2016?
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 22, 2019 15:32:59 GMT -8
Nope. Answering a question with a question isn’t correct. Prove you know the Constitution or shut the fuck up. Try again I answered your question and asked you one in return. You didn't answer. Who did you vote for in 2016? No you didn’t moron. I asked you to DESCRIBE the power Congress has not if they had power. You can’t. That’s the answer. So say “I’m an uneducated chimp and I don’t know the answer.”
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 15:39:01 GMT -8
I answered your question and asked you one in return. You didn't answer. Who did you vote for in 2016? No you didn’t moron. I asked you to DESCRIBE the power Congress has not if they had power. You can’t. That’s the answer. So say “I’m an uneducated chimp and I don’t know the answer.” Why won't you answer the question of who did you vote for? You probably didn't even vote DUMBASS Bitch. Fucking Sloth!
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 22, 2019 15:44:52 GMT -8
No you didn’t moron. I asked you to DESCRIBE the power Congress has not if they had power. You can’t. That’s the answer. So say “I’m an uneducated chimp and I don’t know the answer.” Why won't you answer the question of who did you vote for? You probably didn't even vote DUMBASS Bitch. Fucking Sloth! Because it’s not a relevant question to the discussion. It’s a play in the DUMBFUCK playbook that Cuckservative Trump semen loving morons use to constantly change a subject and create a new gaslight topic. Over and over. You’re just desperate to find something you think you can attack because your ass is fucked raw and it hurts. You’re extremely unhinged over this, that’s why you made a threat like a mental midget coward. No brain just fat mouth and tender heart. I know you’re a DUMBFUCK and now everyone here does too and that’s why. You can’t answer questions about your own beliefs. You called Impeachment corrupt without factual basis and you proved multiple times you don’t know anything about it or how it works. So try again. Describe in your own words the power that Congress has to launch an Impeachment inquiry. Be thorough describe the “laws” that were broken by Democrats in launching the inquiry. Or say “I can’t I’m a DUMBFUCK.”
|
|
|
Post by kuzmasuperstarlol62 on Dec 22, 2019 15:53:51 GMT -8
"Why did 3 of your fellow Democrats vote against impeachment?" Lakerfan1980, here is an article that can be found by doing a simple Google search for 'democrats who voted against impeachment' which answers your question. www.axios.com/trump-impeachment-democrat-defectors-1e2223c3-4945-4dab-a945-f5a21c51c7b5.htmlIn case you do not wish to read the article, I will quote it here so you can read it. "Only two House Democrats crossed party lines to vote to oppose both articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday. Both of them are feeling the pressure of representing swing districts Trump won in 2016. Why it matters: Dissent was low as dozens of other Democrats who represent districts that Trump won sided with impeachment, either voting their conscience or calculating it could be even politically riskier to vote no. Who voted "no" Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), who has represented Minnesota's 7th district since 1991. His district pivoted to support Trump after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-N.J.), a freshman Democrat in New Jersey's 2nd district who is expected to go Republican. He has voted against Trump on nearly all issues except impeachment. His district swung to support Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Also worth noting: Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), a freshman, followed through on his promise to vote yes for the impeachment article accusing Trump of abusing his power — but not the second, which alleges that Trump obstructed Congress. Golden represents Maine's 2nd district, which voted for Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), the only House Democrat to remain publicly undecided on impeachment at the 11th hour, voted "present" for both articles. She was elected to Hawaii's 2nd district in 2013, which remained blue in 2016 as a historically Democratic state. Gabbard characterized her vote as "standing in the center," saying in a statement that she "could not in good conscience vote against impeachment because I believe President Trump is guilty of wrongdoing" — but that a vote for this impeachment would be part of a "partisan process." The backstory: Peterson, Van Drew and Golden — the latter of which are freshman lawmakers — have publicly opposed the impeachment inquiry since October. Gabbard has introduced a resolution to censure Trump as a less severe alternative to removing him from office. Go deeper: The House Democrats supporting impeachment from districts Trump won The impeachment whip list" My point is it is not reasonable for most people to know this answer to such a convoluted question that you could simply research and educate yourself. However seemingly in order to score debate points you chose not to put forth the effort. My question for you is: Why did President Trump abuse his power?
|
|
|
Post by kuzmasuperstarlol62 on Dec 22, 2019 15:54:37 GMT -8
"Why has Nancy Pelosi not sent over Impeachment Documents to the Senate?" Lakersfan1980, here is an article that can be found by doing a simple Google search for 'Why has Nancy Pelosi not sent over Impeachment Documents to the Senate?' which answers your question. www.wsj.com/articles/after-house-impeaches-trump-timing-of-next-steps-is-unclear-11576755097The answer says simply, "House speaker wants more clarity on rules for Senate trial of President Trump, who denounced her decision." My question for you is: Why is Mitch McConnell working to sabotage the Senate trial?
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 16:05:46 GMT -8
"Why has Nancy Pelosi not sent over Impeachment Documents to the Senate?" Lakersfan1980, here is an article that can be found by doing a simple Google search for 'Why has Nancy Pelosi not sent over Impeachment Documents to the Senate?' which answers your question. www.wsj.com/articles/after-house-impeaches-trump-timing-of-next-steps-is-unclear-11576755097The answer says simply, "House speaker wants more clarity on rules for Senate trial of President Trump, who denounced her decision." My question for you is: Why is Mitch McConnell working to sabotage the Senate trial? OK. Let me know when it goes to the Senate so we can start the trial of Trump!
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Dec 22, 2019 16:07:01 GMT -8
"Why did 3 of your fellow Democrats vote against impeachment?" Lakerfan1980, here is an article that can be found by doing a simple Google search for 'democrats who voted against impeachment' which answers your question. www.axios.com/trump-impeachment-democrat-defectors-1e2223c3-4945-4dab-a945-f5a21c51c7b5.htmlIn case you do not wish to read the article, I will quote it here so you can read it. "Only two House Democrats crossed party lines to vote to oppose both articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday. Both of them are feeling the pressure of representing swing districts Trump won in 2016. Why it matters: Dissent was low as dozens of other Democrats who represent districts that Trump won sided with impeachment, either voting their conscience or calculating it could be even politically riskier to vote no. Who voted "no" Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), who has represented Minnesota's 7th district since 1991. His district pivoted to support Trump after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-N.J.), a freshman Democrat in New Jersey's 2nd district who is expected to go Republican. He has voted against Trump on nearly all issues except impeachment. His district swung to support Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Also worth noting: Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), a freshman, followed through on his promise to vote yes for the impeachment article accusing Trump of abusing his power — but not the second, which alleges that Trump obstructed Congress. Golden represents Maine's 2nd district, which voted for Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), the only House Democrat to remain publicly undecided on impeachment at the 11th hour, voted "present" for both articles. She was elected to Hawaii's 2nd district in 2013, which remained blue in 2016 as a historically Democratic state. Gabbard characterized her vote as "standing in the center," saying in a statement that she "could not in good conscience vote against impeachment because I believe President Trump is guilty of wrongdoing" — but that a vote for this impeachment would be part of a "partisan process." The backstory: Peterson, Van Drew and Golden — the latter of which are freshman lawmakers — have publicly opposed the impeachment inquiry since October. Gabbard has introduced a resolution to censure Trump as a less severe alternative to removing him from office. Go deeper: The House Democrats supporting impeachment from districts Trump won The impeachment whip list" My point is it is not reasonable for most people to know this answer to such a convoluted question that you could simply research and educate yourself. However seemingly in order to score debate points you chose not to put forth the effort. My question for you is: Why did President Trump abuse his power? What’s up Wireman Those answers while correct aren’t what’s relevant here with him. He’s asking the question to begin with as if complete ardent party adherence is the norm and the standard by which all Congressional hearings are based. It’s not. And when you see it that is neofascism at work, aka corruption. He’s too stupid to know that. When you grant him that red herring in the question itself you fail because he’s not looking for facts. He’s setting up a faulty argument that he can repeat over and over like the ass reamed butthurt Trump jizz addicted moron that he is.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 16:07:20 GMT -8
"Why did 3 of your fellow Democrats vote against impeachment?" Lakerfan1980, here is an article that can be found by doing a simple Google search for 'democrats who voted against impeachment' which answers your question. www.axios.com/trump-impeachment-democrat-defectors-1e2223c3-4945-4dab-a945-f5a21c51c7b5.htmlIn case you do not wish to read the article, I will quote it here so you can read it. "Only two House Democrats crossed party lines to vote to oppose both articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday. Both of them are feeling the pressure of representing swing districts Trump won in 2016. Why it matters: Dissent was low as dozens of other Democrats who represent districts that Trump won sided with impeachment, either voting their conscience or calculating it could be even politically riskier to vote no. Who voted "no" Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), who has represented Minnesota's 7th district since 1991. His district pivoted to support Trump after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-N.J.), a freshman Democrat in New Jersey's 2nd district who is expected to go Republican. He has voted against Trump on nearly all issues except impeachment. His district swung to support Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Also worth noting: Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), a freshman, followed through on his promise to vote yes for the impeachment article accusing Trump of abusing his power — but not the second, which alleges that Trump obstructed Congress. Golden represents Maine's 2nd district, which voted for Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), the only House Democrat to remain publicly undecided on impeachment at the 11th hour, voted "present" for both articles. She was elected to Hawaii's 2nd district in 2013, which remained blue in 2016 as a historically Democratic state. Gabbard characterized her vote as "standing in the center," saying in a statement that she "could not in good conscience vote against impeachment because I believe President Trump is guilty of wrongdoing" — but that a vote for this impeachment would be part of a "partisan process." The backstory: Peterson, Van Drew and Golden — the latter of which are freshman lawmakers — have publicly opposed the impeachment inquiry since October. Gabbard has introduced a resolution to censure Trump as a less severe alternative to removing him from office. Go deeper: The House Democrats supporting impeachment from districts Trump won The impeachment whip list" My point is it is not reasonable for most people to know this answer to such a convoluted question that you could simply research and educate yourself. However seemingly in order to score debate points you chose not to put forth the effort. My question for you is: Why did President Trump abuse his power? So you disagree with Tulsi Gabbard? www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRPHOlwBQ2U
|
|
|
Post by kuzmasuperstarlol62 on Dec 22, 2019 16:11:11 GMT -8
"Why has Nancy Pelosi not sent over Impeachment Documents to the Senate?" Lakersfan1980, here is an article that can be found by doing a simple Google search for 'Why has Nancy Pelosi not sent over Impeachment Documents to the Senate?' which answers your question. www.wsj.com/articles/after-house-impeaches-trump-timing-of-next-steps-is-unclear-11576755097The answer says simply, "House speaker wants more clarity on rules for Senate trial of President Trump, who denounced her decision." My question for you is: Why is Mitch McConnell working to sabotage the Senate trial? OK. Let me know when it goes to the Senate so we can start the trial of Trump! Also, Lakerfan1980, Trump's demographic in 2016 was white men age 55 and over. Do you think there are more of them now or fewer? The Democratic vote (Hilary Clinton) demographic was everyone else. Do you think there are more of them now or fewer? The 2018 mid term was not a blue wave but it certainly showed a trend that you may not like.
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 16:12:59 GMT -8
OK. Let me know when it goes to the Senate so we can start the trial of Trump! Also, Lakerfan1980, Trump's demographic in 2016 was white men age 55 and over. Do you think there are more of them now or fewer? The Democratic vote (Hilary Clinton) demographic was everyone else. Do you think there are more of them now or fewer? The 2018 mid term was not a blue wave but it certainly showed a trend that you may not like.
Who did you vote for in 2016?
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 16:20:14 GMT -8
Also, Lakerfan1980, Trump's demographic in 2016 was white men age 55 and over. Do you think there are more of them now or fewer? The Democratic vote (Hilary Clinton) demographic was everyone else. Do you think there are more of them now or fewer? The 2018 mid term was not a blue wave but it certainly showed a trend that you may not like.
Who did you vote for in 2016? Actually this was the vote demographic. 53% Whites Voted for Trump 28% of Hispanics Voted for Trump 9% of Blacks Voted for Trump. The number will go up for each demographic because of the good economy and Democrats are scared of that! Who did you vote for?
|
|
|
Post by kuzmasuperstarlol62 on Dec 22, 2019 16:20:37 GMT -8
"Why did 3 of your fellow Democrats vote against impeachment?" Lakerfan1980, here is an article that can be found by doing a simple Google search for 'democrats who voted against impeachment' which answers your question. www.axios.com/trump-impeachment-democrat-defectors-1e2223c3-4945-4dab-a945-f5a21c51c7b5.htmlIn case you do not wish to read the article, I will quote it here so you can read it. "Only two House Democrats crossed party lines to vote to oppose both articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday. Both of them are feeling the pressure of representing swing districts Trump won in 2016. Why it matters: Dissent was low as dozens of other Democrats who represent districts that Trump won sided with impeachment, either voting their conscience or calculating it could be even politically riskier to vote no. Who voted "no" Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), who has represented Minnesota's 7th district since 1991. His district pivoted to support Trump after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-N.J.), a freshman Democrat in New Jersey's 2nd district who is expected to go Republican. He has voted against Trump on nearly all issues except impeachment. His district swung to support Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Also worth noting: Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), a freshman, followed through on his promise to vote yes for the impeachment article accusing Trump of abusing his power — but not the second, which alleges that Trump obstructed Congress. Golden represents Maine's 2nd district, which voted for Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), the only House Democrat to remain publicly undecided on impeachment at the 11th hour, voted "present" for both articles. She was elected to Hawaii's 2nd district in 2013, which remained blue in 2016 as a historically Democratic state. Gabbard characterized her vote as "standing in the center," saying in a statement that she "could not in good conscience vote against impeachment because I believe President Trump is guilty of wrongdoing" — but that a vote for this impeachment would be part of a "partisan process." The backstory: Peterson, Van Drew and Golden — the latter of which are freshman lawmakers — have publicly opposed the impeachment inquiry since October. Gabbard has introduced a resolution to censure Trump as a less severe alternative to removing him from office. Go deeper: The House Democrats supporting impeachment from districts Trump won The impeachment whip list" My point is it is not reasonable for most people to know this answer to such a convoluted question that you could simply research and educate yourself. However seemingly in order to score debate points you chose not to put forth the effort. My question for you is: Why did President Trump abuse his power? So you disagree with Tulsi Gabbard? www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRPHOlwBQ2UCorrect. I disagree with Tulsi Gabbard on most of what she says and does. She and I have similar politics. Same with Buttigieg and Warren. Obama was my favorite President of all.BTW if we can get black people to vote, Trump will get beaten like a drum in 2020! Also BTW I'm not upposed to be posting here until after the season, but this isn't a game thread, so enjoy the games. Go Lakers!
|
|
|
Post by lakerfan1980 on Dec 22, 2019 16:27:21 GMT -8
So you disagree with Tulsi Gabbard? www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRPHOlwBQ2UCorrect. I disagree with Tulsi Gabbard on most of what she says and does. She and I have similar politics. Same with Buttigieg and Warren. Obama was my favorite President of all.BTW if we can get black people to vote, Trump will get beaten like a drum in 2020! Also BTW I'm not upposed to be posting here until after the season, but this isn't a game thread, so enjoy the games. Go Lakers! Finally, a civil engagement. Go Lakers!
|
|