|
Post by lakeshow on Nov 22, 2016 12:10:30 GMT -8
lol those damn emails. Ignore everything else but those damn emails. I wasn't even surprised to be honest America as a whole is racist. I think we need a registry of people who voted for him and those people should be held liable for all of the damage he causes. Right now, because of his business holdings all over the world it would be illegal for him to keep his business (or allow his family to run it) because of the obvious conflict of interest. As in, if he's making trade or even legislative deals with other countries he could very very easily do so on behalf of his own benefit. It's been reported that his infrastructure package that he intends to introduce to congress could be "skimmed from the top" in terms of the budget. But Donald Trump is an honest man of great integrity would never do that right? Intellectually incapable deplorable cunts. When it's all said and done 2b, I believe there are going to be a lot of people fired from his administration or forced out because there's too much money involved in Trump's dealings and the potential for a conflict of interest is great.
|
|
|
Post by lakeshow on Nov 22, 2016 12:15:23 GMT -8
Bannon--Chief Domestic Policy Advisor Priebus--Chief of Staff Ingraham--Maybe Press Secretary General Flynn--National Security Advisor Jeff Sessions--Maybe Attorney General
Nuff said.
Here's your basket of deplorables right here in front of you with the exception of Priebus.
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Nov 22, 2016 12:15:24 GMT -8
I think we need a registry of people who voted for him and those people should be held liable for all of the damage he causes. Right now, because of his business holdings all over the world it would be illegal for him to keep his business (or allow his family to run it) because of the obvious conflict of interest. As in, if he's making trade or even legislative deals with other countries he could very very easily do so on behalf of his own benefit. It's been reported that his infrastructure package that he intends to introduce to congress could be "skimmed from the top" in terms of the budget. But Donald Trump is an honest man of great integrity would never do that right? Intellectually incapable deplorable cunts. When it's all said and done 2b, I believe there are going to be a lot of people fired from his administration or forced out because there's too much money involved in Trump's dealings and the potential for a conflict of interest is great. Do not underestimate the stupidity of his followers Terrence. We are talking about a special level of idiot. A person with no regard for facts, logic or law unless it fits their own narrative. He attempts to mobilize support thru social media. All the budding signs of a fascist dictator. His campaign trail is evidence that his supporters will support him breaking the law so long as he tells them it's not true. And that's despicable.
|
|
|
Post by shaolinfighter on Nov 22, 2016 13:10:59 GMT -8
When it's all said and done 2b, I believe there are going to be a lot of people fired from his administration or forced out because there's too much money involved in Trump's dealings and the potential for a conflict of interest is great. Do not underestimate the stupidity of his followers Terrence. We are talking about a special level of idiot. A person with no regard for facts, logic or law unless it fits their own narrative. He attempts to mobilize support thru social media. All the budding signs of a fascist dictator. His campaign trail is evidence that his supporters will support him breaking the law so long as he tells them it's not true. And that's despicable. I would hope there would be obstacles to this administration getting away with breaking the law. Not just politicians and media but the people themselves who oppose. But it's a small hope as I don't underestimate the stupidity of people on either side tbh.
|
|
hackashaq
::| Basketball Guru |::
Posts: 3,292
|
Post by hackashaq on Nov 23, 2016 2:20:02 GMT -8
Idealogues can't govern because they are too caught up in their hate of everything. Once they get into power, they realize just being anti isnt really governing a country as diverse and complicated as the US. The USA may be the most diverse country in the world, and you are going to antagonize more than 50% of the population?
Although it might hurt the US....the incompetence of the alt....Trump's apparent lack of interest in actually being president, and his idealogue cronies will be exposed.
And no one will be more angry than the rust belt voters who finally realized they voted an incompetent rich dude who had no ones interest than his own into power who had no intention in helping them out.
|
|
|
Post by shaolinfighter on Nov 23, 2016 6:40:51 GMT -8
Idealogues can't govern because they are too caught up in their hate of everything. Once they get into power, they realize just being anti isnt really governing a country as diverse and complicated as the US. The USA may be the most diverse country in the world, and you are going to antagonize more than 50% of the population? Although it might hurt the US....the incompetence of the alt....Trump's apparent lack of interest in actually being president, and his idealogue cronies will be exposed. And no one will be more angry than the rust belt voters who finally realized they voted an incompetent rich dude who had no ones interest than his own into power who had no intention in helping them out.They already feel that way about current/previous administrations. Trump told them what they wanted to hear on his campaign trail
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Nov 23, 2016 11:20:58 GMT -8
Idealogues can't govern because they are too caught up in their hate of everything. Once they get into power, they realize just being anti isnt really governing a country as diverse and complicated as the US. The USA may be the most diverse country in the world, and you are going to antagonize more than 50% of the population? Although it might hurt the US....the incompetence of the alt....Trump's apparent lack of interest in actually being president, and his idealogue cronies will be exposed. And no one will be more angry than the rust belt voters who finally realized they voted an incompetent rich dude who had no ones interest than his own into power who had no intention in helping them out. I don't think so. They've already been conned by the inflammatory con man, who will continue to blow steam up their ass, deflect all responsibility onto something else (like he used Obama) and the minions will follow. Throw in a couple of politically strategized concessions, a coal mine here a oil rig there and they will fall back into line. Watch. As much as I'd like to believe the population would revolt I've seen nothing to suggest that save for the liberal cities protesting now. The more power he exerts, the more people will follow as demonstrated by a long line of fascists.
|
|
hackashaq
::| Basketball Guru |::
Posts: 3,292
|
Post by hackashaq on Nov 23, 2016 11:46:05 GMT -8
God...don't depress me even more. I have to have faith that people will eventually float to the middle.
The alt is not going to give them anything close to what they promised and may do more harm to the "people" than they ever imagined.
|
|
|
Post by lakeshow on Nov 29, 2016 11:20:18 GMT -8
"Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag -- if they do, there must be consequences -- perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!" Trump tweeted.
Now this clown wants to ban people from burning the American flag which is a protected 1st Amendment right. I've seen some ignorant politicians before, but none of the likes of this level. This is is just straight up dictatorship/fascist talk. And if people don't see this, then we are really in trouble.
But this is what you get when people would rather have a pompous, self-centered, and clueless reality tv personality running the country than somebody with substance.
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Nov 29, 2016 15:20:28 GMT -8
"Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag -- if they do, there must be consequences -- perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!" Trump tweeted. Now this clown wants to ban people from burning the American flag which is a protected 1st Amendment right. I've seen some ignorant politicians before, but none of the likes of this level. This is is just straight up dictatorship/fascist talk. And if people don't see this, then we are really in trouble. But this is what you get when people would rather have a pompous, self-centered, and clueless reality tv personality running the country than somebody with substance. Showing signs of totalitarianism before he's even been sworn in. Totalitarian Fascist Authoritarian ^ all words I'd use to describe what this man is foreshadowing. I don't care what anyone of any background, any educational level, anywhere, if you don't recognize the inherent dangers of a leader who shows these signs you aren't smart.
|
|
|
Post by shopson67 on Nov 30, 2016 9:44:30 GMT -8
His twitter addiction and investment conflicts add more layers to the inherent danger. He's immature, can't handle criticism, and could be using his position to better his investments by trading US policy. But hey, email security is a bigger problem.
|
|
|
Post by history2b on Nov 30, 2016 10:34:34 GMT -8
His twitter addiction and investment conflicts add more layers to the inherent danger. He's immature, can't handle criticism, and could be using his position to better his investments by trading US policy. But hey, email security is a bigger problem.But in reality it never was. It was simply a chosen point of attack on a candidate in order to manipulate and smear an opponent. Why did Trump meet with Former General Petraeus for the Secretary of State position after he pled guilty on charges of mishandling classified information? A campaign that spent one year hammering away against Clinton about classified information now considers a man who's already been found guilty of such for the same position? It's not hypocrisy, it simply highlights the stupidity of the people who bought into the campaign bs and now bury their heads in the sand.
|
|
|
Post by shopson67 on Dec 1, 2016 9:49:17 GMT -8
His twitter addiction and investment conflicts add more layers to the inherent danger. He's immature, can't handle criticism, and could be using his position to better his investments by trading US policy. But hey, email security is a bigger problem.But in reality it never was. It was simply a chosen point of attack on a candidate in order to manipulate and smear an opponent. Why did Trump meet with Former General Petraeus for the Secretary of State position after he pled guilty on charges of mishandling classified information? A campaign that spent one year hammering away against Clinton about classified information now considers a man who's already been found guilty of such for the same position? It's not hypocrisy, it simply highlights the stupidity of the people who bought into the campaign bs and now bury their heads in the sand. Of course it was never a real issue. Bush 2 also used his own server. The right has been trying to load up on Clinton for at least a decade.
|
|
|
Post by samadams10 on Dec 1, 2016 11:04:38 GMT -8
Blame also goes to dems and HRC campaign for not effectively countering. They were operating under the assumption that they had it locked in. When they go low we go high is bullshit in politics. Fk the dems too for putting up a flawed candidate who could not win against an locker rio talking pussy grabber.
|
|
|
Post by samadams10 on Dec 1, 2016 11:05:07 GMT -8
Blame also goes to dems and HRC campaign for not effectively countering. They were operating under the assumption that they had it locked in. When they go low we go high is bullshit in politics. Fk the dems too for putting up a flawed candidate who could not win against an locker rio talking pussy grabber.
|
|
|
Post by lakeshow on Dec 1, 2016 12:25:32 GMT -8
Blame also goes to dems and HRC campaign for not effectively countering. They were operating under the assumption that they had it locked in. When they go low we go high is bullshit in politics. Fk the dems too for putting up a flawed candidate who could not win against an locker rio talking pussy grabber. But if Hillary couldn't win, who would Sam? Don't think Bernie would of won either.
|
|
hackashaq
::| Basketball Guru |::
Posts: 3,292
|
Post by hackashaq on Dec 1, 2016 13:11:11 GMT -8
Blame also goes to dems and HRC campaign for not effectively countering. They were operating under the assumption that they had it locked in. When they go low we go high is bullshit in politics. Fk the dems too for putting up a flawed candidate who could not win against an locker rio talking pussy grabber. But if Hillary couldn't win, who would Sam? Don't think Bernie would of won either. Bernie might have, we'll never know. Bernie could relate to those Rust Belt voters in ways Hillary never really could.
|
|
|
Post by lakeshow on Dec 1, 2016 13:54:50 GMT -8
But if Hillary couldn't win, who would Sam? Don't think Bernie would of won either. Bernie might have, we'll never know. Bernie could relate to those Rust Belt voters in ways Hillary never really could. Yes, I think he could relate on a different level than Hillary could and perhaps may have gotten more younger voters. I just think too many people saw his policies as too left wing and some of it was overkill imo.
|
|
hackashaq
::| Basketball Guru |::
Posts: 3,292
|
Post by hackashaq on Dec 1, 2016 15:08:07 GMT -8
Trumps genius Treasury Secretary nominee is proposing to get rid of the mortgage interest deduction. This is (a) gonna tank the housing market, and (b) especially hurt those middle class families living in high cost of living areas along the East and West Coasts...i.e. Non-Trump Country. It's a big FU to them.
Also they are talking about "repeal and delay" on Obamacare, meaning since they actually do not have a viable plan to replace ACA, they'll just repeal it and replace it with nothing until they find a "better" solution, which is probably never.
20 million who got healthcare for the first time may lose it in the space of only a few years.
This is a disaster.
Plus his HHS nominee is targeting Medicare and Medicaid. Lord help us.
|
|
|
Post by samadams10 on Dec 1, 2016 17:39:27 GMT -8
Blame also goes to dems and HRC campaign for not effectively countering. They were operating under the assumption that they had it locked in. When they go low we go high is bullshit in politics. Fk the dems too for putting up a flawed candidate who could not win against an locker rio talking pussy grabber. But if Hillary couldn't win, who would Sam? Don't think Bernie would of won either. I don't know T. I'm inclined to agree with hack and Bernie won the primaries in those solid blue rust belt states that HRC could not carry. Bernie had a populist message as well that was really exciting the base and the millenials. Although HRC was very qualified Grumman experience standpoint, she just could not shake her lack of likability. No charisma and inspirational persona like Obama or even bill bj cigar.
|
|